MapPorn

A referenced map of the Roman Empire at its greatest extent.

A referenced map of the Roman Empire at its greatest extent.
https://i.redd.it/f3mzrxqr1vbf1.jpeg
Reddit

Discussion

CLSmith15

If we're using the contemporary names then I believe Mare Nostrum ("Our Sea") would be more accurate than Mediterraneum Mare.

The term Mare Nostrum originally was used by the Romans to refer to the Tyrrhenian Sea after their conquest of Sicily, Sardinia and Corsica during the Punic Wars with Carthage. By 30 BC, Roman dominion had extended from the Iberian Peninsula to Egypt, and Mare Nostrum began to be used in the context of the whole Mediterranean Sea. Other names were also employed, including Mare Internum ("Internal Sea"), but they did not include Mare Mediterraneum, which was a Late Latin creation that was attested to only well after the Fall of Rome.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mare_Nostrum#Original_usage

2 hours ago
PatrickAmo

"Judea", not "Palestine".

Palestine was the name the Romans gave that same territory after expelling jews from there for rebelling against the empire.

9 hours ago
omrixs

As it should be.

The Roman Empire reached its greatest extent during the reign of Trajan (98-117 CE). The Romans only changed the name of Judaea to Syria Palestina (not just “Palestine”) in 136 CE, under Hadrian’s rule and after the Judaean/Jewish Bar Kochba revolt (132-136 CE) was defeated.

8 hours ago
PatrickAmo

As it should be.

What do you mean?

8 hours ago
omrixs

If this map is one of the Roman Empire at its greatest extent, then that means that it’s depicting the state of affairs at a time somewhen during Trajan’s reign, i.e. between 98 CE to 117 CE.

During that time, the province west of Arabia Petraea, north-east of Egypt (Aegyptus) and south of Syria was called Judaea.

The name of the Roman province of Judaea was only changed to Syria Palestrina in 136 CE, 19 years after Trajan died.

As such, the correct name for the province in this map is Judaea, not Syria Palestina.

8 hours ago
PuzzleheadedCell7708

They changed the name later bro. 🤡

6 hours ago
horatiowilliams

Correct.

4 hours ago
properOCD

Libya travelled west as centuries passed by

10 hours ago
Rahbek23

Libya was essentially just the name the egyptians used for the people west of them.

10 hours ago
Level-Tangerine-3877

global warming

4 hours ago
Any_Time_312

Sarumata has never been that high north. Horses don't fare well in freezing swamps.

7 hours ago
MadaraOfTheSharingan

Slavs: Exist

Romans: Yeah, lump em in there with Sarmatia!

5 hours ago
eferalgan

There were no Slavs in Europe at that time. Sarmatians are not Slavs

4 hours ago
MadaraOfTheSharingan

People speaking proto-Slavic, the second divergent branch from Balto-Slavic (the other one being Baltic), is at the most estimated to have developed around the 2nd millennium BCE in what is Central-Eastern Europe.

And that's what I'm saying. Slavs have been in Central Eastern Europe for centuries before the Migration Era, yet they're never shown on maps, and everything East of fucking Rome is labeled Sarmatia, as innacurate as it is lol.

4 hours ago
eferalgan

They don’t appear on any maps because Slavs came in Europe from Asia starting with 6 Century AD

4 hours ago
MadaraOfTheSharingan

I genuinely believe you have to be trolling, but just in case you aren't, no. Slavs didn't come from Asia. They've inhabited Polesia for centuries.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Slavic_language

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Slavs

3 hours ago
erty3125

I had to go look up what the fuck Albania was doing over there and found out about Caucasian Albania, which while interesting also feels like an incredible shit post that pre Azerbaijan "Albanian's" lived there

1 hour ago