You can always tell when a post on here is made by an Indian/South Asian
Mobile tester: *tests mobile*
And? How does that matter
The posts aren’t funny
Humor is also like beauty
It depends
This post is about as funny as a cockroach is beautiful
It is an opinion based on your humour sense
The post has 93% upvotes and 1800+ upvoters seems to think it is funny..
As I said, what might sound humor might sound nonsense to someone else. What might sound witty might sound cocky to others. It's all perspectives.
Because nobody speaking English as a first language calls a cell phone a "mobile".
Between that, missing grammatical articles, and the atrocious use of punctuation (kind of silly for a programmer to suck at punctuation, but I can understand it from a QA tester I guess), it's just obviously a meme by someone who speaks English only when necessary. Given English is a lingua franca in India, a lot of broken English memes come from there and garner a bit of a reputation in the anglosphere.
I'm just saying don't expect programmers to not be annoyed by details like that; syntax errors are our jobs to fix.
I can confirm that people speaking English as a first language do in fact use the term “mobile”.
Source, I am English.
You don't get it, bro. English is only spoken in America.
Geez bro , be careful to not fall from that tower of superiority complex
Fixing syntax error is your job 😦. Talk about a non essential job 😦
If only there was a way to convey this information to your wife...
insert i would tell her if i had one meme her
Who uses an actual phone to test, should use an emulator
Emulators probably cannot simulate a lot of real-life scenarios an actual user will face.
Most testers use actual phones and even multiple phones. Emulator testing is never enough
Yea, learned this the hard way
Who uses an actual emulator to test, should use your imagination
I found many issues with emulators that never occurred on actual devices and vice versa. I prefer to have an actual device to also properly observe the performance of the apps
So you don't care about how easy the buttons are to reach, if it is usable and intuitive on an actual touch screen?
You use an emulator for test automation. For manual tests just use a phone it's so much more reliable.
Because emulators are totally representative of users' end machines all the time for all test cases, totally.
Emulators use too much RAM, using an actual phone is faster
Ram is dirt cheap. Thats not the reason. 64gb ram costs less than half a day of salary.
Good luck testing gyroscopes and gps related features on an emulator
Are here any manual developers?
You mean a technical writer?
I can barely read, let alone test the manual