I have a conspiracy theory that the auto agent on cursor intentionally produces bad code so that you burn more credit.
10 hours ago
PoolMost8181
I swear this has happened to me as well. It got stuck in an infinite loop of debug and fixing and after 3hours it worked. By that time i was wondering why didnt i just do it myself
10 hours ago
anachronisdev
:cs::cp::bash::py:
Well it does choose the model that's the most available. Sadly only Anthropic's Claude and OpenAI's gpt4.1 models are actually decent at the tool calls required for proper Cursor use, which is why you run into infinite loops and other weird stuff so easily on auto mode.
5 hours ago
Void_Speaker
I used to work for GoDaddy back in the day. We did sales on IT calls.
It really seemed like they would occasionally run a script to break a bunch of A records, and we would have a flood of calls with an easy fix problem, which gave us an opportunity to sell more shit.
3 hours ago
Sassaphras
:py:
I yelled at it once for doing the same thing three times and it started deleting a lot of stuff. Luckily I have good Git habits.
I have a conspiracy theory that the auto agent on cursor intentionally produces bad code so that you burn more credit.
I swear this has happened to me as well. It got stuck in an infinite loop of debug and fixing and after 3hours it worked. By that time i was wondering why didnt i just do it myself
Well it does choose the model that's the most available. Sadly only Anthropic's Claude and OpenAI's gpt4.1 models are actually decent at the tool calls required for proper Cursor use, which is why you run into infinite loops and other weird stuff so easily on auto mode.
I used to work for GoDaddy back in the day. We did sales on IT calls.
It really seemed like they would occasionally run a script to break a bunch of A records, and we would have a flood of calls with an easy fix problem, which gave us an opportunity to sell more shit.