ProgrammerHumor
aICannotReplaceHim
Discussion
I'm not pissed, I'm impressed!
Edit:typo
Impissed!
Mista zozin is a legend.
Helo helo everyone and welcome, to yet anotha recreational programming session with a mista a Zozin (starts beatboxing)
How do someone become as good as him ? I mean the guy can literally code anything and learn anything in mins ?
He codes every day in all languages he can find, even the most stupid ones. And then creates his own and codes in them.
Man as if he knows how to talk to computers and everything is second nature to him
No, him doing it every day made it a second nature. Nothing happens automatically, you actually have to work to get good.
Just hard work and dedication. Easy.
also I think most people forgot that this dude has ben programming for literal decades already. I think many assume hes younger than his actual age due to the... aesthetics
He's a got a gift. Got it.
If working hard was easy even i could do it 🤣
You get used to it, though. Your brain does the translating. I don't even see the code. All I see is blonde, brunette, redhead. Hey uh, you want a drink?
Bro been straight coding since before 2007 just so you can have an idea. Hard work, staying consistent and loving what you do. This guy literally manages to stream almost everyday of the week (during the whole year) and still not run out of content (and he doesn’t even prepare his coding sessions) + takes the effort to edit / upload the videos to his youtube channel, that is discipline.
Stop using AI
The real secret in getting really good at anything is heavily focusing on the details and fundamentals, perfecting them. The memes about not knowing basic things out of your head is a meme, a footballer who can't do a perfect pass like a robot without thinking about it is a bad one. When you gather many things to an intuition level you can focus on the big picture.
He puts in the hours and likes what he does, simple as.
IQ is almost exclusively a genetic trait. Either you have it, or you don't.
Until we know which genes are responsible for that (I heard they have some research going in China since some time), and how to reprogram an already grown up organism (which would also require to "rewire the brain", which likely meas to replace it…), there's not much one can do. OTOH you wouldn't be you any more after such procedure, anyway. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
But regardless, I think programming GUIs in C is not very smart. It's imho actually very stupid. Doing things "just because you can" is almost always idiocy…
Famously, you can improve at IQ tests by studying
That doesn't mean it's not inherent though. IQ tests are what measures, and IQ is what is being measured. No test will perfectly capture what is being measured. That fact doesn't in itself say anything about the thing itself.
There's this cool thing that when you practice a lot you get very good at what you do! You should try it!
"IQ is almost exclusively a genetic trait"
No, that is false. Genetics play a role but not as much as one might think it does.
I've been reading so many Rust articles, that I've read your first sentence as: "IO is almost exclusively a generic trait"
Iq is the entry barrier, it defines your potential, achieving it is hard work. Go try playing chess for 12 hours a day with zero studying just brute forcing, I can guarantee you will improve massively if you keep doing that for long enough
I love him. Protect him at all cost
Now that is rawdogging hardcore GUI bruh. I cannot imagine putting in the effort of doing GUI programming without object-oriented programming
Immediate mode programming is the one true way.
You can mimic a bunch of OOP styles using C. Just looking at the struct he's defining is showing a bunch of other nested Structs within the definition. Only real difference is you don't get to define visibility as part of the language.
Not having classes to organize methods is what really does it for me. That being said, I still love C
You can even do polymorphism using clever struct padding.
C devs reinventing C++, exhibit #23e34873.
God, everyday I love C++ more.
Modern React is no longer OO but functional
Doing a UI in C is going to piss off everyone that has to touch it.
Absolute coding
Guy just casually visualising fast fourier transform... I wish to never look upon this shit again
This guy is dope
Does this guy even work at Blizzard though
AI would go mechahitler if it tried to comprehend the video
"Did you make a UI in C with no framework?"
"Yes."
"Does it correctly handle non-Western input methods and accessibility technology?"
"Uh... Well..."
What if hes trying to fight globalism AND inclusiveness while coding his UI
Not all heroes wear capes
that looks like a ragebait
As a React dev, I want to see this!
I love what this guy does but his videos are so hard to watch
Why?
The exact opposite for me. They're very easy to follow because he clearly talks through his reasoning, he understands and brings you to understand the WHY of things. He doesn't just mindlessly read and copypaste from docs or LLMs, he shows the whole process of discovery and understanding, which imho is very interesting to watch
Maybe not C, but... What if you were developing a game, and started making your own engine in C++? https://kittenspaceagency.wiki.gg/wiki/BRUTAL It's already been showing some amazing results.
lol
We need to have a pop-up for the summer sale, and the main website should have an animated background of the beach. We need to finish this by tomorrow, and we have bottom of the barrel coders who're paid peanuts.
I dunno this doesn't sound awful, React is at least as silly and it's somehow widely accepted.
Doing good work.
I remember making a text based GUI in my freshman year. It's nothing complicated, just arrow key navigation for a 2048 game. It was fun.
Now I create shitty CRUD web apps, so I prefer React.
Where is the Issue? I am doing UI in Excel+VBA… 😅
I am way too stupid for this
I wouldn't call a visualization UI programming.
UI programming is dealing with, buttons, hover states, active states, tab indexes, windows, popovers, modals, animations, animation states, the list is endless -- and doing it well is really hard -- AND THEN rendering via GPU.
This example is creating an graph basic on audio input into a FFT.
What you meant was "missing interactivity".
Then what you meant was creating a basic graph from the FFT analysis of a given audio source.
Which invalidate your first fist claim as, that graph, is an interface for the user over the data he wants to see, in this context, an overview of the frequency spectrum of the audio he's been giving as source.
Don't worry, we'll stay here to help you in the future. Did you manage to center that div in your react project ?
POV: you’re watching someone implement ecmascript in real time.
I love this guy 🫶🏽
Loved his videos until a recent haskell video where he went off on a stupid tangent calling the haskell website slop because it just looked nice lmao
That's pretty cool... but as a nerd it's my duty to point out that he's not optimally organizing the data within his struct to minimize the amount of padded bytes.
Doing a one-off UI for your weekend project in C is not impressive.
Take a walk kid
Going fast when you're working alone isn't really impressive. How about doing an actual user interface for other people instead of just some lame visualizer. I've had tons of colleagues bragging about being able to do this sort of stuff, and they make shit interfaces for themselves and noone else.
You are the type of guy everyone in the industry hates. Literally, you always know it better and probably are never wrong either. Just shut the fuck up if you don't have anything of value to add or just spread your negativity, scroll the fuck on
The type of guy everyone in the industry hates is actually the hobbyist that produces 0 value but acts like he's a god programmer (and better than you R*eact devs who actually make things that people use, of course) because he spent 3 months making a shitty native program in C.
Why the fuck would people in the industry hate hobbyists LOL they're not even IN the industry that's why it's called hobbyists... Im also not even a react dev but whatever
I said "react devs" in reference to OP's print screen
No i dont know this better, but this doesn't impress me. Gamedevs do it all the time. But if all of your GUI amounts to nested menus, its not fucking impressive, buddy. Doing real interfaces for real people to get actual shit done, impresses me. React or C, i dont care.
"I'm gonna break a leg to piss off professional olympic runners which have trainers and personal doctors and shit". Goofy ahh attitude.
Are you a React dev?
No. Just commenting on how ridiculous the title is.
Not really a good analogy. Plus, it's just a joke, guy.
Ahh he got ya!
I'm not a react dev tho. The logic of his title got me.
Nahh you got got bro it's alright we all get got every once in a while
One react dev pissed off. Millions others to come
millions must segfault
Comparing a broken leg to designing a UI in C — and likening React developers to Olympic athletes — just proves that in both cases, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
More like "I'm gonna swim in the sea to piss off people in the kiddie pool"
Learned C in first year nearly 30 years ago. The pointers still give me nightmares.
Ahh, back in college 20 years ago I learned how to do UI in C using OpenGL. That was only a two week lesson in an academic setting, and even then I was like nah I’m done with this FOREVER
But how performant was that UI
The thing about low level programming is that while you can make things fast you can also make things slow and shitty and with way more bugs. C doesn't just magically make things faster, it takes actual skill and effort.
Oh, skill and effort was what I was missing. Can I import that?
There's an npm package but it depends on left pad :/
Obviously that’s an immediate import.
Can only be lazy loaded
But the Rust folks say, when you code in Rust it will be "blazingly fast and memory-efficient", just because Rust!
They don't want to believe (even I've seen samples in the past) that when an average dev translates some average code in, say Java, to Rust the result will be almost certainly a few times slower than when run on the JVM.
Ah yes, "The Rust Folks", AKA the straw man/generalized group "they" who all think homogenously.
The reason they put that in quotes is its literally stated on the Rust website as a fact.
And then here's a literal "I'm a Java dev wanting to use Rust" with multiple Rust people stating that just using Rust will make code more gooder: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/is-rust-really-faster-than-java-because-of-memory-management/80651
So no, its not a straw man.
Okay but you're comparing it to Java, so in this case they're actually right.
It doesn't have to be Rust. It just has to not be Java.
You should also actually read your source:
You're cherry picking and ignoring everything else.
But is it even correct? What code runs slower in rust than in java?
The straw man here is thinking that fast language = fast code automatically, which is stupid
https://users.rust-lang.org/t/is-rust-really-faster-than-java-because-of-memory-management/80651
Found the vegan.
Oh man. I read Java and understood JavaScript. I was bewildered for a moment
Is that true? I don't know Rust and Java that much, but it seems counterintuitive. Why is that?
Translation does not transfer the nuance in language. I don't have the grasp of rust but the memory efficiency of rust is a concept not present (or often taught?) in Java, same with pointers of C.
You can probably learn the syntax of analogous features like a for loop, but beyond that, literal translation between languages does not indicate understanding of each language.
I don't think so. It's completely unrelated to low level graphics programming, but if you make the same code in a slow language, and a fast language, the slower one will simply be n times slower.
I can't think of an example where you could somehow make the exact same concept run slower on rust/C/whatever compared to Java. The drawback of lower level languages is having to deal with extra stuff like memory bugs or the borrow checker, not that you can somehow do super slow code with them. I think OP's example makes no sense
So while c is perfomant the better question is: is your c code performant
*sobbing in assembler
I remember doing well enough in the class, so I assume it was as performant as any other code written by a college student building UI components with OpenGL would be.
Not very
Oh, hey. I had the same experience, but it was a month.
I've done GUI by implementing my own draw functions for Java's swing library, so I understand the pain even if I haven't done it as low level as just C and OpenGL.